Does anyone know what the Vintage Aircraft Association is about? Why does it exist? I'm not being snarky, I'm serious.
Today, while reading an article in the latest Vintage Magazine about a Buhl Airsedan, I found something that is getting to be all too familiar; the celebration of the permanent grounding of vintage aircraft. Sure, some of you will read that article and wonder where was the celebration but you should understand that making it to print means one of three qualifications has been met; it is worthy of celebrating, it notes a loss or disaster, or it is news. Since nowhere in the article did anyone lament the loss of another flying aircraft or the airworthy parts contained within, and it wasn't written in the form or language reserved for mere news, then it was for all practical purposes a celebration of the restoration and where it was to end up. This is bothersome.
Yes, it is possible the problem is with my perception of Vintage. For as long as I can remember, I thought Vintage was about rescuing, restoring, and flying vintage airplanes and promoting the same to future generations. Yet, the culmination of the article about the Buhl told a different story. This piece was about a family who found two rare flying machines, bought them, restored one, flew them a little, got a few moments of glory at Oshkosh, and then took them home to "retire" (park permanently) both machines in a monument to their family
These stories are always the same. Family claims to love flying and to have always had the passion, proclaim their interest in bringing back of piece of history to flying condition, then everything they say and do after that defies all that preceded. In fact, the last two paragraphs read as though these people had rarely ever laid eyes on anything outside of commercial aviation and that the Airsedan restoration was nothing more than a whim.
So is there a problem with that? Nope, not at all. People can do whatever they want with their aircraft. The issue at hand is the willingness of our flying publications to publish articles with such obvious inconsistencies and to make these people out as heroes. This brings me back to my question; what is Vintage about?
If it is about parking vintage airplanes in monuments to ourselves, then this article is right at home. Yet, if Vintage is about rescuing, rebuilding, and flying old planes and promoting the same to new and future generations, then this article has no place is this publication. Furthermore, "Vintage" management should make sure that anything which celebrates the unnecessary parking of a vintage airplane is never printed in Vintage again.
Oh wait, I forgot a very important point. On page one of the same issue, Vintage President Geoff Robison was lamenting the decline in Vintage membership. Now ask yourself, "how exactly does a group that is losing members come to the conclusion it would be a great idea to make heroes of people who are grounding vintage aircraft"? It's a head-scratcher.